I’m in what happens when meet and neither behaves as .
- Interested, here, means I’ve spent far too much time thinking this through with ChatGPT, Claude and talking to myself in the shower.
- Finally putting all those actuarial skills to use: overcomplicated spreadsheets, elaborate mental models and the comforting fact that numbers rarely talk back.
- People do talk back. They also change their minds, refuse to behave like the assumptions and reveal what the spreadsheet was missing.
- AI is very good at predicting what usually happens. People are very good at making “usually” the important word.
I love looking for the moment when a makes perfect and complete to a .
- A system is often just a series of sensible decisions that have never met one another because committees.
- Paper has never had to fill in its own form.
- Much of life’s absurdity comes from treating the foreseeable consequences of our own actions as unforeseen events.
- The proposition was simple enough to sound unreasonable: insurance might help people while they were alive.
Where the footnotes lead
Enough with the footnotes.
I think out loud about insurance, AI, behaviour change, and the small absurdities where they meet. If that sounds like your kind of problem, say hello.
Jonathan Roomer